September 13, 2000    Sunnyvale, California  Since 1994

The Sun
Classifieds Advertising Archives Search About us
News









    Local school districts no fans of Prop. 38 vouchers

    Supporters say plan would give families more choice

    By Michelle Alaimo

    Local school districts are taking a No stance against Proposition 38 which would give parents a $4,000 school voucher per child to help pay for private schooling. And a recent poll shows that many voters agree that Proposition 38 is not the way to go.

    A Field Poll survey conducted in August indicated that 49 percent of voters polled are against the Proposition 38 voucher program, 36 percent are in favor of the program and 15 percent are undecided.

    Timothy Draper, former California State Board of Education member and millionaire, is sponsoring Proposition 38, which will appear on the California ballot Nov. 7. He has vowed up to $40 million dollars to help support the campaign.

    "Prop. 38 finally gives parents the chance to rescue their children who are in failing schools," Chris Bertelli, spokesperson for 38 Yes School Vouchers 2000 campaign, said. The group's supporters include parents, Draper and other organizations, including some minority groups.

    However, many groups and organizations, including school boards throughout the state, the California Teachers Association and the League of Woman Voters support the No Vouchers 2000 campaign, which is against the voucher measure.

    "Prop. 38 is like rolling loaded dice," said Jon Lenzner, spokesman for No Vouchers 2000. "It's a risky experiment."

    Lenzner explains that currently more than 700,000 students in California attend private schools. With the passage of Proposition 38, taxpayers would instantly have to hand out nearly $3 billion to cover vouchers. Couple that with students who would leave public schools for private--taking the funding with them-the affect on school funding and taxpayers would be tremendous, Lenzner said.

    Proposition 98, passed by voters in 1988, requires approximately 40 percent of the state budget be allocated toward public schools, including community colleges and state schools for the deaf and handicapped. If Proposition 38 passes, Proposition 98 would be repealed if the state's per pupil funding reaches or exceeds the national average, with only kindergarten through 12th- grade schools receiving funding.

    Cupertino Union School District Superintendent William Bragg agrees with Lenzner and said that any program that takes away from school funding and provides no accountability will not be supported.

    "Public Schools would lose resources and still be held accountable," Bragg said, adding that Proposition 38 does not require voucher schools to meet the same requirements as public schools.

    Bragg said his board could make a resolution against the vouchers during a late September or early October board meeting. The Fremont Union High School District has also not taken a formal stance on the issue but will discuss passing a resolution against Proposition 38 at their Sept. 5 meeting, superintendent Joe Hamilton said.

    However, the Sunnyvale School District has already adopted a formal resolution against Proposition 38 at their Aug. 17 board meeting stating many of the same reasons cited by the No Vouchers 2000 committee.

    The California State Board of Education unanimously voted to oppose Proposition 38 in July. Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin described Proposition 38 "as the most irresponsible voucher initiative that has ever been presented to any group of citizens."

    However, the 38 Yes School Vouchers campaign states on its website that Proposition 38 saves taxpayers billions of dollars over time; requires no tax increases; provides financial and educational accountability to parents and students; and claims that voucher schools cannot discriminate and must certify that their course requirements meet those required by California colleges and universities.

    Bertelli adds that students in vouchers schools are required to take standardized tests and the results would be available for parents to analyze. He adds that if voters pass Proposition 38, it would provide "new and stronger funding guarantees for public schools."

    The whole issue may seem like dejà vu to California voters. In 1993, voters overwhelmingly voted against school vouchers ,but Bertelli seemed optimistic that there would not be a repeat defeat. Bertelli explained that the California economy is extremely different than in 1993, many schools have continued to fail and that education is at the top of every voter's mind.

    If approved by voters, Proposition 38 could become effective as early as July 1, 2001 for kindergarten students with remaining grades phasing in over a four-year period.



Cover Story
Local cyclists are struggling to find safe havens to ride their bikes

News
News Briefs

Residents will have the opportunity to vote on fluoridation issue in November election

Educators join with NASA Ames Research Center to develop a plan to close the 'digital divide'

Local school districts are opposed to Proposition 38

Public Safety

Letters & Opinions
Speak Out

Brian Rossman: Time for fall football gambling

Deborah Taylor-Hollis: Trying to survive the summer of 'Survivor'

Community
Community Briefs

A new four-woman exhibit is now on display at the Los Gatos Museum of Art and Natural History

Family Daze: Treating children equally is a mind-numbing task

Wedding: Annie Nordby and Jeffrey Moyer

Gardening
Planting bulbs and plants now will reap a springtime of blooms

Sports

Sports Briefs

High school football

De Anza Community College football

Calendar
Lectures, readings, auditions, sports & recreation,announcements, theater & arts, kids' stuff, clubs, public meetings...

Feedback
Something to say?


Copyright © Metro Publishing Inc. Maintained by Boulevards New Media.