December 28, 2005     Willow Glen, California Since 1992
Classifieds Advertising Archives Search About us
Speak Out
Sending problem back
to neighbors can work

My dream house is where I would buy a small house on a relatively small lot. Then I would overbuild on it, alienating my neighbors and making enemies of them. Then I would build an elevated sanctuary so I could see into their yards. ("Commission asks couple on Glenn Ave. to work with neighbors, Dec. 14.")

Since these plebeian neighbors might complain about privacy, I would plant a lot of trees on the remaining small piece of my back yard, shading the yards around me. The neighbors would now have to relandscape their established yards to plant shade-tolerant foliage. This would cost hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, but these whiners would have their privacy.

Yea .... this is my idea of a dream house.

Good for the planning commission to go out and look at the situation. Nothing helps a decision more than firsthand observation. I applaud the commission sending the matter back to the neighbors. It worked on Glenwood Avenue.

What the heck is neo-French eclectic: new, rude and throw in everything but the kitchen sink?

Patrick Coleman

Willow Glen


Correction

In a Dec. 21 story "Skylark development needs a more compatible design," the article stated that normally a maximum of 25 homes can be constructed on a site less than 2 acres. The maximum number of homes in the article was incorrect because the rules applying to this project have to do with the General Plan designation and not the development's density.

Copyright © Knight Ridder